Post details: Which really causes global warming: The Sun being brighter or man-made CO2 pollution?

Sunday, March 26, 2006

Which really causes global warming: The Sun being brighter or man-made CO2 pollution?

--Image: Earth on Fire --In the ongoing debate over whether human beings are to blame for increasing temperatures, researchers are about to add a new (and far more likely) cause to the mix: the Sun has become brighter over the last twenty years.

From an article in The Australian:

The sun is getting brighter, increasing the pace of climate change and undermining claims that man alone is to blame.

A series of independent studies around the world show a significant rise in the amount of sunshine penetrating the atmosphere to be absorbed by the earth’s surface and turned into heat.

The research will concern climate researchers, who are already predicting a rapid rise in global temperatures due to man-made emissions of so-called greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

“The enhanced warming we have seen since the 1990s along with phenomena such as the widespread melting of glaciers could well be due to this increased intensity of sunlight compounding the effect of greenhouse gases,” said Martin Wild of the Institute of Atmospheric and Climate Science in Zurich, Switzerland.

Researchers will present their findings to the European Geophysical Union conference in Vienna next week.

They reverse a 30-year trend. Measurements of sunshine levels between 1960 and 1990 have shown a decrease in the amount of sunshine reaching the earth, a phenomenon known as global dimming.

This was thought to have been caused by dust, smog and other pollutants, mainly from industrialised Western countries.

The pollutants, known as aerosols, reduced sunshine levels by absorbing and scattering solar radiation and promoting the formation of clouds that reflected radiation back into space.

In the past two decades, however, there have been huge decreases in such pollutants, partly due to industry becoming cleaner but largely because of the collapse of the Soviet Union and much of its heavy industry.

“Sunshine levels had been decreasing by 2 per cent a decade between 1960 and 1980 - a total decline of about 6 per cent. Now they are going up again. Perhaps this is why our Swiss glaciers are melting,” Professor Wild said.

Such rises could be disastrous for agriculture, wildlife and human settlements in many regions, especially the tropics.

But scientists warn they may have to revise these calculations sharply upwards if the impact of “global brightening” has to be factored in.

Atsumu Ohmura, of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, has collated measurements from 400 sites worldwide and found an increase in sunshine at 300 of the sites studied.

The areas under scrutiny were mainly in Eurasia and the polar regions.

Some of the areas studied showed a decline in sunshine since 1990, largely in fast-developing countries such as China and India.

“A widespread brightening has been observed since the 1980s. This may substantially affect surface climate, the water cycle, glaciers and ecosystems,” Professor Ohmura said.

So if we’d signed onto the Kyoto Protocol and had started messing with our economies to reduce CO2 emissions, how stupid would we feel about now as we learn that the Sun is probably to blame for rising temperatures? Pretty darn stupid – and about $500 billion poorer. Thank you, President Bush for bucking the “consensus.”

 

Recent related articles:

Global warming for skeptics

Global Warming, Frodo Baggins, and the Empire State Building

 

Tags: | | | |

 

Comments:

Comment from: Wadard [Visitor] Email · http://globalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com
"So if we’d signed onto the Kyoto Protocol and had started messing with our economies to reduce CO2 emissions, how stupid would we feel about now as we learn that the Sun is probably to blame for rising temperatures? Pretty darn stupid – and about $500 billion poorer. Thank you, President Bush for bucking the 'consensus.'"

Actually if you were intelligent you would probably be feeling pretty smart and smug because you would be in a much better situation to take on the force multiplier effect of global brightening. Your smug truimphalism does not take into account that global brightening theory does not rule out global warming theory; anthropomorphic injected atmospheric carbon dioxide is still in the dock. Global brightening will only aggravate the effects of greenhouse warming, much like hotter ocean temperatures fuel cat 4 and 5 hurricanes more often. Global brightening is all the more reason why we need our polar ice caps intact.
Permalink Monday, March 27, 2006 @ 03:06
Comment from: cchris [Member] Email · http://www.toptechwriter.us
Hi Wadard,

It's Global Warming Madness this week as Time magazine's cover story is Global Warming -- Be Worried, Be Very Worried and the editorial board of the Austin American-Statesman writes:

So it is up to us. Up to us to acknowledge that the problem is real, to recognize its potential for devastating the Earth and to understand that it might be irreversible if we don't act quickly.

Global warming can seem an impossible conundrum to face. But we ought to address that part of the equation we do control: gaseous emissions. New studies are forcing us to face the reality of a warming planet. And public service announcements by the Ad Council are making the point that how we live makes a difference.

We should pay attention. Tomorrow may be too late.


The very same week we find out that the Sun is getting brighter, which by itself can cause climate change! That, along with news two months ago that plants account for much more methane in the atmosphere than scientists had predicted, indicates that us skeptics were correct to question how much impact humans have on global warming.

[PAUSING TO PLAY SMUG TRIUMPHAL MUSIC ON MY HARMONICA]

You can argue all you want that we're responsible for GW, but:

  • Now that the bogus "hockey stick" has been replaced by more accurate renderings that include the medieval warm period and little ice age, the latest climate reconstructions show wide swings in temperature over the last 1,000 years


  • Plants are pumping far more methane into the air than was expected


  • The Sun's brightness is changing much more quickly than anyone expected


The evidence against AGW is mounting. Again, I agree there's no question that we're increasing CO2 levels, but the amounts are too small to matter compared to what Nature creates and the impacts of forcing agents like the Sun.

In other words, we could return to an agrarian economy tomorrow and there'd still be Cat 4 and 5 hurricanes, and melting ice caps.

Actually if you were intelligent


Ohhhh, that's harsh, Wadard. The more so since you're such an enthusiastic proponent for AGW that I value your opinion of my intelligence very highly.

[PAUSING AGAIN FOR SMUG TRIUMPHAL MUSIC]

Ah, now I feel much better.

It's the Sun we're talking about! An 11,000°F thermonuclear gasbag hanging 93 million miles away from Earth, that now appears to have a "climate" of its own, consisting of hot and cool spells, and bright and dim patches -- one that's every bit as varied as the Earth's.

Except in this case when the Sun sneezes, it's the Earth that gets a fever.
Permalink Monday, March 27, 2006 @ 07:42

Leave a comment:

Comments policy
  • Keep it civil--No profanity!
  • No personal attacks on me or any other commenter.
  • If you leave a comment and I don't answer it, don't take it personally as I'm probably too busy to respond. If the comment was complimentary, thank you.
  • If you post spam messages, you will be banned!
  • It's OK to include links to your blog site or other web pages if they are appropriate to the subject.
  • I may delete a comment at any time if it violates the comments policy.
Disclaimer: Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect my views. Obscene or abusive remarks will be deleted when found, but the fact that particular comments remain on my site in no way constitutes an endorsement by me.
Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)

Chris Christner's Blog

Pic of the Day

Sunspot Loops in Ultraviolet

RDF, RSS .92, RSS 2.0, Atom

September 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<< <     
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Search

Recent Posts

Image Gallery

Favorite Posts

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Engadget
Gizmodo
InstaPundit
Junk Science
Michelle Malkin
Engadget
Power Line
The Longevity Meme
Transterrestrial Musings

 

Misc

spacer

TopTechWriter.US

|| Valid XHTML || Valid CSS || Valid RSS || Valid Atom || skin by www.keoshi.com :: powered by b2evolution home